Re: [PATCH] lock assertion macros for 2.5.30

From: Thunder from the hill (thunder@ngforever.de)
Date: Wed Aug 07 2002 - 19:07:45 EST

Next message: Joel Becker: "[PATCH] [2.4.20-pre1] Watchdog Stuff (1/4)"
Previous message: Thunder from the hill: "[PATCH][2.0] My part of the history lesson: Documentation/Changes"
In reply to: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [PATCH] lock assertion macros for 2.5.30"
Next in thread: Oliver Xymoron: "Re: [PATCH] lock assertion macros for 2.5.30"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi,

On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> Random gripe: don't all those do { } whiles look silly? We need
>
> #define NADA do { } while (0)
>
> or similar.

Call it nop.

Thunder

-- .-../../-./..-/-..- .-./..-/.-.././.../.-.-.-

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Joel Becker: "[PATCH] [2.4.20-pre1] Watchdog Stuff (1/4)"
Previous message: Thunder from the hill: "[PATCH][2.0] My part of the history lesson: Documentation/Changes"
In reply to: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [PATCH] lock assertion macros for 2.5.30"
Next in thread: Oliver Xymoron: "Re: [PATCH] lock assertion macros for 2.5.30"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 07 2002 - 22:00:38 EST