Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
>
>>Since Linus does not do pre-patches anymore, he mentioned some time ago
>>it would be nice if somebody created an automated BK snapshot process to
>>make BK changes accessible between kernel releases. I've done that.
>>
>>ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jgarzik/snap/2.5/
>
>
>>Questions and comments welcome.
>
>
> Heh, I've had something vaguely like this on NL.linux.org:
>
> ftp://ftp.nl.linux.org/pub/linux/bk2patch/
>
> Every 3 hours it creates a unidiff between the latest
> tagged version and the head of the bk tree, for both 2.5
> and 2.4.
Just to forestall other private responses [already gotten two], mine is
slightly different than your's, and David Woodhouse's setup. My goal
was basically to create a daily pre-patch, complete with hacked
EXTRAVERSION. That's something that is familiar to testers (pre-patch
form), and the snapshot is not so often that people will get buried in a
flurry of patches and csets. can you say "2.5.30-bk439" ;-)
So I consider my dailies as a complement to your bk2patch and dwmw2's
output, not redundant. Programmers would probably find dwmw2's per-cset
patches to be more useful, while testers and power users, and maybe
maintainers, would prefer daily pre-patches to test and sync against.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 15 2002 - 22:00:17 EST