Re: [bug, 2.5.29, IDE] partition table corruption?

From: Thunder from the hill (thunder@lightweight.ods.org)
Date: Thu Aug 08 2002 - 19:11:42 EST

Next message: Thunder from the hill: "Re: Unix-domain sockets - abstract addresses"
Previous message: Peter Samuelson: "Re: 64bit clean drivers was Re: Linux 2.4.20-pre1"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [bug, 2.5.29, IDE] partition table corruption?"
Next in thread: Marcin Dalecki: "Re: [bug, 2.5.29, IDE] partition table corruption?"
Reply: Marcin Dalecki: "Re: [bug, 2.5.29, IDE] partition table corruption?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi,

On Thu, 2002-08-08 at 13:18, Marcin Dalecki wrote:
> becouse anything else doesn't make much sense and disks have passed the
> 512MB or even 4G barrier quite a time ago.

I have lots of pseudo-diskless hosts. Whereever I didn't want to spend
money for a boot PROM, I've grabbed out disks of ~30M, and things worked
fine. If things don't, I also have a Busybox on those disks which can be
booted instead of the network. They're clients, routers, blah...

Thunder

-- .-../../-./..-/-..- .-./..-/.-.././.../.-.-.-

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Thunder from the hill: "Re: Unix-domain sockets - abstract addresses"
Previous message: Peter Samuelson: "Re: 64bit clean drivers was Re: Linux 2.4.20-pre1"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [bug, 2.5.29, IDE] partition table corruption?"
Next in thread: Marcin Dalecki: "Re: [bug, 2.5.29, IDE] partition table corruption?"
Reply: Marcin Dalecki: "Re: [bug, 2.5.29, IDE] partition table corruption?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 15 2002 - 22:00:18 EST