Re: flushing arp buffer -- why __skb_dequeue rather than __skb_dequeue_tail

From: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
Date: Fri Aug 09 2002 - 08:34:37 EST

Next message: Jens Axboe: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.30 IDE 115"
Previous message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: 2.4.19 Oops :Unable to handle kernel paging request"
In reply to: Chris Friesen: "flushing arp buffer -- why __skb_dequeue rather than __skb_dequeue_tail ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hello!

> __skb_dequeue_tail()? The latter would result in FIFO

Hmmm... actually, it is supposed to be FIFO now. :-)
skb_dequeue_tail would result in lifo.

Probaly, you deal with an older kernel, I remember we had a bug here.

Alexey
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jens Axboe: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.30 IDE 115"
Previous message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: 2.4.19 Oops :Unable to handle kernel paging request"
In reply to: Chris Friesen: "flushing arp buffer -- why __skb_dequeue rather than __skb_dequeue_tail ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 15 2002 - 22:00:19 EST