Re: [PATCH] Linux-2.5 fix/improve get_pid()

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Fri Aug 09 2002 - 08:59:00 EST

Next message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: fix CONFIG_HIGHPTE"
Previous message: Michael Procter: "Re: Unix-domain sockets - abstract addresses"
In reply to: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: [PATCH] Linux-2.5 fix/improve get_pid()"
Next in thread: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: [PATCH] Linux-2.5 fix/improve get_pid()"
Reply: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: [PATCH] Linux-2.5 fix/improve get_pid()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:

> I almost put 99999, but then I realized that that's silly.
> For years Linux had a hard limit of about 4000 processes,

That limit was removed some 2 years ago.

Rik

-- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: fix CONFIG_HIGHPTE"
Previous message: Michael Procter: "Re: Unix-domain sockets - abstract addresses"
In reply to: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: [PATCH] Linux-2.5 fix/improve get_pid()"
Next in thread: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: [PATCH] Linux-2.5 fix/improve get_pid()"
Reply: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: [PATCH] Linux-2.5 fix/improve get_pid()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 15 2002 - 22:00:19 EST