> I probably won't be using this since my scripts already do a nightly
> pull, but I'd also like to see what people think of this. I have a
> setup that does a nightly pull of 2.5, builds it for UP and SMP, pushes
> to two machines (UP and SMP) and runs LTP on it. Then sends me back the
> results of all of it. Of course if something fails that didn't fail the
> previous day, I have a limited set of Changesets as culprits so it's
> easier for me to find the cause of problems when I do more frequent
> testing like this. Any major problems are reported immediatly of
> course, but would anyone be interested in seeing the results of this
> more often? I don't know if I have enough space on the LTP website to
> post all the data that's gathered every single day (It would add up
> REALLY fast), but would a weekly rollup to lkml be something people
> would like to see?
Personally, I'd love to see the *changes* in what passed and failed
posted every day - the whole result set is obviously too big. The
quicker people know what's wrong, the quicker it gets fixed, before
we build more on top of an unstable foundation.
M.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 15 2002 - 22:00:19 EST