Re: [BK] [PATCH] reiserfs changeset 7 of 7 to include into 2.4 tree

From: Hans Reiser (reiser@namesys.com)
Date: Sat Aug 10 2002 - 13:14:59 EST

Next message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: about the tuning of eepro100"
Previous message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [patch 6/12] hold atomic kmaps across generic_file_read"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: [BK] [PATCH] reiserfs changeset 7 of 7 to include into 2.4 tree"
Next in thread: Marcelo Tosatti: "Re: [BK] [PATCH] reiserfs changeset 7 of 7 to include into 2.4 tree"
Reply: Marcelo Tosatti: "Re: [BK] [PATCH] reiserfs changeset 7 of 7 to include into 2.4 tree"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I forgot to mention that a variety of benchmarks of various allocator
options are on www.namesys.com/benchmarks.html. They aren't very
understandable, but if questions are asked I'll answer them.

-- Hans

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: about the tuning of eepro100"
Previous message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [patch 6/12] hold atomic kmaps across generic_file_read"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: [BK] [PATCH] reiserfs changeset 7 of 7 to include into 2.4 tree"
Next in thread: Marcelo Tosatti: "Re: [BK] [PATCH] reiserfs changeset 7 of 7 to include into 2.4 tree"
Reply: Marcelo Tosatti: "Re: [BK] [PATCH] reiserfs changeset 7 of 7 to include into 2.4 tree"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 15 2002 - 22:00:22 EST