Re: why not a "unsigned long long" for rx_bytes in linux/drivers/atm/horizon.h ?

From: Stephane Wirtel (stephane.wirtel@belgacom.net)
Date: Sat Aug 10 2002 - 17:22:30 EST

Next message: Stephane Wirtel: "why not a "unsigned long long" for rx_bytes in linux/drivers/atm/horizon.h ?"
Previous message: David Brownell: "Re: [linux-usb-devel] [RFC] USB driver conversion to use "struct device_driver""
In reply to: Stephane Wirtel: "why not a "unsigned long long" for rx_bytes in linux/drivers/atm/horizon.h ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

sorry, the kernel is 2.4.19
> i have seen a patch for linux/net/core/dev.c and
> linux/include/linux/netdevice.h
>
> in the struct net_device_stats, rx_bytes is in unsigned long long, why not
> the rx_bytes of linux/drivers/atm/horizon.h ?
>
> thanks

-- 
Stephane Wirtel <stephane.wirtel@belgacom.net>
Web : www.linux-mons.be	 "Linux Is Not UniX !!!"
Address :
    Rue de cartier, 53
    6030 Marchienne-au-Pont
    Belgium
Phone :	+32 474 768 072
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Stephane Wirtel: "why not a "unsigned long long" for rx_bytes in linux/drivers/atm/horizon.h ?"
Previous message: David Brownell: "Re: [linux-usb-devel] [RFC] USB driver conversion to use "struct device_driver""
In reply to: Stephane Wirtel: "why not a "unsigned long long" for rx_bytes in linux/drivers/atm/horizon.h ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 15 2002 - 22:00:22 EST