I have noticed that difference in 2.4.1 and 2.5.25 is
:-
(2.4.1)
if (BAD_RANGE(zone,page))
BUG();
DEBUG_ADD_PAGE
(2.2.25)
if (bad_range(zone, page))
BUG();
prep_new_page(page);
prep_new_page(page) is replaced with DEBUG_ADD_PAGE
and prep_newpage is :-
/*
* This page is about to be returned from the page
allocator
*/
static inline void prep_new_page(struct page *page)
{
BUG_ON(page->mapping);
BUG_ON(PagePrivate(page));
BUG_ON(PageLocked(page));
BUG_ON(PageLRU(page));
BUG_ON(PageActive(page));
BUG_ON(PageDirty(page));
BUG_ON(PageWriteback(page));
page->flags &= ~(1 << PG_uptodate | 1 <<
PG_error |
1 << PG_referenced | 1 <<
PG_arch_1 |
1 << PG_checked);
set_page_count(page, 1);
}
vs
#define DEBUG_ADD_PAGE \
if (PageActive(page) || PageInactiveDirty(page) || \
PageInactiveClean(page)) BUG();
Can i also replace DEBUG_ADD_PAGE with prep_new_page
in 2.4.1. Is it OK ?
Thank you very much for your help.
--- Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com> wrote:
> > I am using 2.4.1 on SH4 and using only 32 MB RAM
> > without hard-disk, so only thing i am using is 32
> MB
> > RAM .
>
> Could you try a more recent kernel?
> 2.4.1 is now almost 2 years old.
>
> T.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs
http://www.hotjobs.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 15 2002 - 22:00:26 EST