Re: RE:Re: The spam problem.

From: David Schwartz (davids@webmaster.com)
Date: Mon Aug 12 2002 - 02:35:56 EST


On Mon, 12 Aug 2002 00:15:53 -0500, Jim Roland wrote:

>Now there's a good thought! Post, Confirm, gets posted. If member, no
>confirmation necessary.

        You could also put them in a manual hold queue. Give a large number of
people ability to approve posts from that queue so latency would be
reasonable.

        The problem with confirmation is that a person might fire off a bug report
where they happen to be, via something like

dmesg > foo
joe foo
cat foo + mail -s "Bug report blah blah" linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

        A confirmation sent to the source address of that might not be noticed until
the next time they happen to log into that account on that machine.

        You could do both, I guess. A hold queue that can be manually processed with
confirmation posting the message and removing it from the hold queue.

        DS

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 15 2002 - 22:00:26 EST