Re: Unix-domain sockets - abstract addresses

From: David Woodhouse (dwmw2@infradead.org)
Date: Mon Aug 12 2002 - 09:28:57 EST

Next message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: [OT] Re: The spam problem."
Previous message: Rik van Riel: "Re: pte_chain leak in rmap code (2.5.31)"
In reply to: Keith Owens: "Re: Unix-domain sockets - abstract addresses"
Next in thread: Thunder from the hill: "Re: Unix-domain sockets - abstract addresses"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

kaos@ocs.com.au said:
> Untested, against 2.5.31. It would be better to -Uunix globally but
> one header depends on it, drivers/message/fusion/lsi/mpi_type.h.

/me looks... Urgh. Let it break.

-- dwmw2

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: [OT] Re: The spam problem."
Previous message: Rik van Riel: "Re: pte_chain leak in rmap code (2.5.31)"
In reply to: Keith Owens: "Re: Unix-domain sockets - abstract addresses"
Next in thread: Thunder from the hill: "Re: Unix-domain sockets - abstract addresses"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 15 2002 - 22:00:28 EST