Re: [BK] [PATCH] reiserfs changeset 7 of 7 to include into 2.4 tree

From: Hans Reiser (reiser@namesys.com)
Date: Mon Aug 12 2002 - 15:33:35 EST

Next message: Peter Chubb: "Re: RE:Re: The spam problem."
Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: 2.5.31: modules don't work at all"
In reply to: Marcelo Tosatti: "Re: [BK] [PATCH] reiserfs changeset 7 of 7 to include into 2.4 tree"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

You'll also find that reiserfs scales much better on machines with many
processors with this patch in use. It still is very coarse grained
compared to V4, but the bitmap scanning was consuming so much CPU while
locking out other processors that it was a performance problem for one
person measuring our performance on 8-way machines.

-- Hans

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Peter Chubb: "Re: RE:Re: The spam problem."
Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: 2.5.31: modules don't work at all"
In reply to: Marcelo Tosatti: "Re: [BK] [PATCH] reiserfs changeset 7 of 7 to include into 2.4 tree"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 15 2002 - 22:00:29 EST