Re: [patch] config language dep_* enhancements

From: Tom Rini (trini@kernel.crashing.org)
Date: Mon Aug 12 2002 - 17:15:55 EST


On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 12:13:51AM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> > > More examples of the cml1 limitations can be found in arch/ppc/config.in -
> > > a single choice statement needs to be splitted into multiple choice
> > > statements.
> >
> > Er, which are you referring to here? All of the choice statements are
> > done for clarity here. :) Tho I was (and have been) pondering creating
> > arch/ppc/platforms/Config-[468]xx.in, which would rather nicely move all
> > of the options related to IBM 4xx processors to one file, Motorola 8xx
> > to another, and general PPC's nicely.
>
> There is still a bit of overlap. Roughly it's possible to sort the machine
> types by cpu type, but IMO it's not the best solution. I think it would be
> better to sort them by general machine type.

Er, 'general machine type' ?

-- 
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 15 2002 - 22:00:29 EST