> I pointed out before the null check was flawed. And all I see is the
> same identical patch churned out again. Regardless of whether that
> paticular stupid error was in the old code, not fixing it in the new
> code when its pointed out is a bit of a mess.
>
> I'm not sure its a simplification either. More function pointers don't
> always make for neater - but thats a side issue. If the NULL check goes
> I'm not too worried about the other stuff.
OK, that's easily disposed of, and it'll remove even more lines of
redundant code.
Thanks,
M.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 15 2002 - 22:00:32 EST