Re: [TRIVIAL] Designated initializers for i386

From: Dave Jones (davej@suse.de)
Date: Tue Aug 13 2002 - 16:16:21 EST

Next message: Tom Miller: "[PATCH] IBMMCA 2.5.31"
Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH] simplify b_inode usage"
In reply to: Rusty Russell: "[TRIVIAL] Designated initializers for i386"
Next in thread: Rusty Russell: "Re: [TRIVIAL] Designated initializers for i386"
Reply: Rusty Russell: "Re: [TRIVIAL] Designated initializers for i386"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 06:18:59PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Sorry for batching these, but there are so damn many.

Do you have many more of these jumbo patchsets pending ?
I've yet to find a word that sums up just how annoying it is
to have a bunch of pending patches made totally useless due to
these largely pointless (for now) patches.

Dave

-- 
| Dave Jones.        http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Tom Miller: "[PATCH] IBMMCA 2.5.31"
Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH] simplify b_inode usage"
In reply to: Rusty Russell: "[TRIVIAL] Designated initializers for i386"
Next in thread: Rusty Russell: "Re: [TRIVIAL] Designated initializers for i386"
Reply: Rusty Russell: "Re: [TRIVIAL] Designated initializers for i386"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 15 2002 - 22:00:34 EST