Re: [patch 4/21] fix ARCH_HAS_PREFETCH

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Wed Aug 14 2002 - 20:37:33 EST

Next message: Dax Kelson: "Re: Will NFSv4 be accepted?"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: Will NFSv4 be accepted?"
In reply to: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: [patch 4/21] fix ARCH_HAS_PREFETCH"
Next in thread: David Lang: "Re: [patch 4/21] fix ARCH_HAS_PREFETCH"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 2002-08-15 at 02:28, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> True indeed as well, although we should still have a busy_wait(); macro
> that can insert whatever hint instruction the architecture might or
> might not have.

We have one - its called cpu_relax()

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Dax Kelson: "Re: Will NFSv4 be accepted?"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: Will NFSv4 be accepted?"
In reply to: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: [patch 4/21] fix ARCH_HAS_PREFETCH"
Next in thread: David Lang: "Re: [patch 4/21] fix ARCH_HAS_PREFETCH"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 15 2002 - 22:00:38 EST