William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> With and without kmap_atomic() -based copy_*_user() patches from akpm.
>> Taken on a 16x/16GB box.
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 07:10:13PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> Have you seen any instability with these things applied? I seem to be
> getting a fair amount of these BUG()s. But, I imagine that it could
> be a race uncovered because of the serialization that highmem locks
> caused.
> kernel BUG at softirq.c:229!
> invalid operand: 0000
Hmm, I didn't catch this one. OTOH I did use a fwd port of an earlier
version of the patch. Shall we kgdb? Which box/workload?
Cheers,
Bill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 15 2002 - 22:00:41 EST