Re: [TRIVIAL] Warn users about machines with non-working WP bit

From: Pavel Machek (pavel@suse.cz)
Date: Mon Aug 20 2001 - 15:06:49 EST

Hi!

> >I just get another idea, that might be easier to get right. If
> >the only problem is one process changing the mm while another
> >process is doing a copy_to_user, we should be able to fix it by
> >placing a readlock on the mm while the copy_to_user is in progress.
> >
> >
> Yes, that would work. copy_to_user is never called with the mmap
> semaphore locked, i.e.
>
> #define copy_to_user(...) > down(&current->mm->mmap_sem); > check_wp_bit(); > real_copy_to_user(); > up(&current->mm->mmap_sem)
>
> verify_area would just check that the pointer is below TASK_SIZE, and
> the wp bit is checked within copy_to_user().
>
> But how many 80386 Linux systems that run the 2.4 kernel exist?

Many embedded boxes, I beieve, have modern 386 CPUs.
                                                                Pavel 

-- 
Philips Velo 1: 1"x4"x8", 300gram, 60, 12MB, 40bogomips, linux, mutt,
details at http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/velo/index.html.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Aug 23 2002 - 22:00:18 EST