is kernel compilation supposed to change header file timestamps?

From: Chris Friesen (cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com)
Date: Thu Aug 22 2002 - 11:41:19 EST

Next message: Tomas Szepe: "Re: ServerWorks OSB4 in impossible state"
Previous message: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: 32 bit arch with lots of RAM"
Next in thread: george anzinger: "Re: is kernel compilation supposed to change header file timestamps?"
Reply: george anzinger: "Re: is kernel compilation supposed to change header file timestamps?"
Reply: Sam Ravnborg: "Re: is kernel compilation supposed to change header file timestamps?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I noticed the other day that on a kernel compile, the timestamps of some files are changed. The
funny thing is that all the changed ones are header files, but not all header files are modified.

Is this expected behaviour?

Chris

-- 
Chris Friesen                    | MailStop: 043/33/F10  
Nortel Networks                  | work: (613) 765-0557
3500 Carling Avenue              | fax:  (613) 765-2986
Nepean, ON K2H 8E9 Canada        | email: cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Tomas Szepe: "Re: ServerWorks OSB4 in impossible state"
Previous message: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: 32 bit arch with lots of RAM"
Next in thread: george anzinger: "Re: is kernel compilation supposed to change header file timestamps?"
Reply: george anzinger: "Re: is kernel compilation supposed to change header file timestamps?"
Reply: Sam Ravnborg: "Re: is kernel compilation supposed to change header file timestamps?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Aug 23 2002 - 22:00:25 EST