>>I think the skbinit patch and recycling skbs are mutually exclusive.
>I would say they are more orthogonal than mutually exclusive.
>Although ou still need to prove that relocating the code actually helps in
>real life. On paper it looks good.
Troy Wilson (who works with me) posted SPECweb99 results using my
skbinit patch to lkml on Friday:
http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0208.2/1470.html
I know you don't subscribe to lkml. Have you seen these results?
On Numa machine it showed around 3% improvement using SPECweb99.
Regards,
Mala
Mala Anand
IBM Linux Technology Center - Kernel Performance
E-mail:manand@us.ibm.com
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/linuxperf
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/projects/linuxperf
Phone:838-8088; Tie-line:678-8088
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Aug 31 2002 - 22:00:17 EST