Re: [PATCH] make raid5 checksums preempt-safe

From: Horst von Brand (vonbrand@eeyore.valparaiso.cl)
Date: Mon Aug 26 2002 - 20:38:46 EST

Next message: Wessler, Siegfried: "AW: Alright, I give up. What does the "i" in "inode" stand for?"
Previous message: Stephen Samuel: "Re: interrupt latency"
Next in thread: Thunder from the hill: "Re: [PATCH] make raid5 checksums preempt-safe"
Reply: Thunder from the hill: "Re: [PATCH] make raid5 checksums preempt-safe"
Reply: Mark Atwood: "How can a process easily get a list of all it's open fd?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Robert Love <rml@tech9.net> said:
> On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 17:09, Thunder from the hill wrote:
>
> > These will suck when on if, I guess...
>
> hm?
>
> > Anyway, will this compile at all? There seems no semicolon after the
> > asm volatile ()
>
> Ah yes, curses. Thanks.

Also, kindly place "do { ... } while(0)" around XMMS_SAVE, if only for
symmetry.

-- 
Dr. Horst H. von Brand                   User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica                     Fono: +56 32 654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria              +56 32 654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile                Fax:  +56 32 797513
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Wessler, Siegfried: "AW: Alright, I give up. What does the "i" in "inode" stand for?"
Previous message: Stephen Samuel: "Re: interrupt latency"
Next in thread: Thunder from the hill: "Re: [PATCH] make raid5 checksums preempt-safe"
Reply: Thunder from the hill: "Re: [PATCH] make raid5 checksums preempt-safe"
Reply: Mark Atwood: "How can a process easily get a list of all it's open fd?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Aug 31 2002 - 22:00:19 EST