Hi Bill,
> ...
> against my current production kernel, 2.4.19-ac4. Machine in Athlon
> 1400MHz, 1GB RAM, 20+30GB WD disks.
> ...
> Then I did my nightly backup of a scanned documentation project, making a
> CD image from the scans, currently ~570MB. I was on ck3-aa, and I said
> "self, that seemed pretty fast!" So I rebooted cold and tried the mkisofs
> with both kernels, twice each.
> 2.4.19-ac4 2.4.19-ck3-aa
> mkisofs 570MB 2:05 1:14
with WOLK v3.6 and only ONE harddisk drive:
root@codeman:[/] # du -skh /home
605M /home
root@codeman:[/] # find /home|wc -l
7384
root@codeman:[/] # time mkisofs -o /delme.iso -allow-multidot -iso-level 3 -J
-max-iso9660-filenames -U -R /home
...
real 1m12.872s
user 0m1.840s
sys 0m10.800s
with one big file:
root@codeman:[/] # du -skh /home/onebigfile.delme
620M /home
root@codeman:[/] # time mkisofs -o /delme.iso -allow-multidot -iso-level 3 -J
-max-iso9660-filenames -U -R /home/onebigfile.delme
...
real 0m35.676s
user 0m1.180s
sys 0m10.740s
:-)
Anyway, I also tested the patchset from Con, both, with -aa VM and -rmap VM
and I must say, -rmap is much slower than -aa VM.
Testmashine: Celeron 800MHz
256MB RAM
1x Seagate 30GB running in UDMA4 (ATA66) mode
Filesystem: ext3, data=ordered
I think with your mashine this could be a bit faster also ;)
--
Kind regards
Marc-Christian Petersen
http://sourceforge.net/projects/wolk
PGP/GnuPG Key: 1024D/569DE2E3DB441A16
Fingerprint: 3469 0CF8 CA7E 0042 7824 080A 569D E2E3 DB44 1A16
Key available at www.keyserver.net. Encrypted e-mail preferred.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Aug 31 2002 - 22:00:20 EST