Re: Bug in kernel code?

From: Luca Barbieri (ldb@ldb.ods.org)
Date: Tue Aug 27 2002 - 22:57:50 EST

Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: Bug in kernel code?"
Previous message: Keith Owens: "Re: Functions with Large Stack Usage"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: Bug in kernel code?"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: Bug in kernel code?"
Reply: David S. Miller: "Re: Bug in kernel code?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 05:39, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: "Stephen C. Biggs" <s.biggs@softier.com>
> Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 19:42:36 -0700
>
> How about (unsigned long)(~0)?
>
> Realistically possible with any known configuration?
How about replacing the loop with ffs/__ffs that would be more elegant,
shorter and avoid any problem or doubt?

application/pgp-signature attachment: This is a digitally signed message part

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: Bug in kernel code?"
Previous message: Keith Owens: "Re: Functions with Large Stack Usage"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: Bug in kernel code?"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: Bug in kernel code?"
Reply: David S. Miller: "Re: Bug in kernel code?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Aug 31 2002 - 22:00:21 EST