On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 11:35:49 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au> wrote:
> But these are not performance-critical functions. And by far the
> most inefficient part of them is that they're reading data for
> CPUs which cannot exist. That can be fixed with a `cpu_possible(i)'
> test in there, but Rusty was going to give us a `for_each_cpu' macro.
> We haven't seen that yet.
I have it, but Linus isn't taking the prerequeisite, which changes cpu masks
to generic bitmaps.
Due to be retransmitted in the next couple of days,
Rusty.
-- there are those who do and those who hang on and you don't see too many doers quoting their contemporaries. -- Larry McVoy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Aug 31 2002 - 22:00:22 EST