How about the old Marketing name CONFIG_CCNUMA?
Tim
On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 12:29, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > - bool 'Multiquad NUMA system' CONFIG_MULTIQUAD
> > > > + bool 'Multi-node NUMA system support' CONFIG_X86_NUMA
> > >
> > > Why not simply CONFIG_NUMA?
> >
> > Because NUMA is subordinate to X86, and another technology named NUMA
> > might appear? Nano-uplinked micro-array... No Ugliness Munched Archive?
> > Whatever...
>
> NUMA means non-uniform memory access. At least IBM, AMD and SGI do
> NUMA; and I guess anyone with 100+ nodes *has* numa machine. (BUt as
> andrea already explained, CONFIG_NUMA is already taken for generic
> NUMA support.)
>
> Pavel
>
> --
> Casualities in World Trade Center: ~3k dead inside the building,
> cryptography in U.S.A. and free speech in Czech Republic.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing
> real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in!
> http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim
> _______________________________________________
> Lse-tech mailing list
> Lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lse-tech
-- Timothy D. Witham - Lab Director - wookie@osdlab.org Open Source Development Lab Inc - A non-profit corporation 15275 SW Koll Parkway - Suite H - Beaverton OR, 97006 (503)-626-2455 x11 (office) (503)-702-2871 (cell) (503)-626-2436 (fax)- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Aug 31 2002 - 22:00:25 EST