> 2.4.20-pre5: prevent sparc32's atomic_read() from possibly discarding
> const qualifiers from pointers passed as its argument.
Ok, the only reasonable way to deal with the last reiserfs vs.
sparc32 compilation warning is apparently to strip the const from
the wait_buffer_until_released() prototype, as it doesn't make any
sense there. Marcelo please disregard the atomic_read() patch and
apply the following instead:
diff -urN linux-2.4.20-pre5/fs/reiserfs/buffer2.c linux-2.4.20-pre5.n/fs/reiserfs/buffer2.c
--- linux-2.4.20-pre5/fs/reiserfs/buffer2.c 2002-09-01 17:19:26.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.4.20-pre5.n/fs/reiserfs/buffer2.c 2002-09-01 17:07:27.000000000 +0200
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
hold we did free all buffers in tree balance structure
(get_empty_nodes and get_nodes_for_preserving) or in path structure
only (get_new_buffer) just before calling this */
-void wait_buffer_until_released (const struct buffer_head * bh)
+void wait_buffer_until_released (struct buffer_head *bh)
{
int repeat_counter = 0;
diff -urN linux-2.4.20-pre5/include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h linux-2.4.20-pre5.n/include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h
--- linux-2.4.20-pre5/include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h 2002-09-01 17:19:27.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.4.20-pre5.n/include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h 2002-09-01 17:16:32.000000000 +0200
@@ -1845,7 +1847,7 @@
/* buffer2.c */
struct buffer_head * reiserfs_getblk (kdev_t n_dev, int n_block, int n_size);
-void wait_buffer_until_released (const struct buffer_head * bh);
+void wait_buffer_until_released (struct buffer_head *bh);
struct buffer_head * reiserfs_bread (struct super_block *super, int n_block,
int n_size);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 22:00:14 EST