Re: extended file permissions based on LSM

From: Daniel Phillips (phillips@arcor.de)
Date: Sun Sep 01 2002 - 10:55:39 EST

Next message: Trond Myklebust: "Re: [PATCH] Initial support for struct vfs_cred [0/1]"
Previous message: Luca Barbieri: "Re: [PATCH] Initial support for struct vfs_cred [0/1]"
Next in thread: Chris Wright: "Re: extended file permissions based on LSM"
Reply: Chris Wright: "Re: extended file permissions based on LSM"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sunday 01 September 2002 02:26, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Ingo Oeser (ingo.oeser@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de) wrote:
> >
> > So this is a correctly pointed out design weakness: The way the
> > user took to reach the inode cannot be taken into account.
>
> Yes, this is known, and there are anticipated VFS changes to remedy
> this.

Could you describe them, please?

-- 
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Trond Myklebust: "Re: [PATCH] Initial support for struct vfs_cred [0/1]"
Previous message: Luca Barbieri: "Re: [PATCH] Initial support for struct vfs_cred [0/1]"
Next in thread: Chris Wright: "Re: extended file permissions based on LSM"
Reply: Chris Wright: "Re: extended file permissions based on LSM"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 22:00:14 EST