Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Include LRU in page count

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Sun Sep 01 2002 - 20:08:48 EST

Next message: Con Kolivas: "Benchmarks for performance patches (-ck) for 2.4.19"
Previous message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Include LRU in page count"
In reply to: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Include LRU in page count"
Next in thread: Christian Ehrhardt: "Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Include LRU in page count"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote:

> Are we looking at the same thing? The cpu load there is dominated by
> cpu_idle, 89%. Anyway, if your point is that it makes sense to run
> shrink_cache or refill_inactive in parallel, I don't see it because
> they'll serialize on the lru lock anyway. What would make sense is to
> make shink_cache nonblocking.

Working on it ;)

Rik

-- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Con Kolivas: "Benchmarks for performance patches (-ck) for 2.4.19"
Previous message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Include LRU in page count"
In reply to: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Include LRU in page count"
Next in thread: Christian Ehrhardt: "Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Include LRU in page count"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 22:00:15 EST