Re: RAID5 checksum algorithm selection

From: Jurriaan (thunder7@xs4all.nl)
Date: Tue Sep 03 2002 - 09:41:01 EST

Next message: Jan Kasprzak: "Re: RAID5 checksum algorithm selection"
Previous message: James Bottomley: "Re: aic7xxx sets CDR offline, how to reset?"
In reply to: Jan Kasprzak: "RAID5 checksum algorithm selection"
Next in thread: Jan Kasprzak: "Re: RAID5 checksum algorithm selection"
Reply: Jan Kasprzak: "Re: RAID5 checksum algorithm selection"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

From: Jan Kasprzak <kas@informatics.muni.cz>
Date: Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 04:18:46PM +0200
>
> Why does the kernel decide to use the pIII_sse function,
> even though the p5_mmx is faster?
>
> The kernel is 2.4.20-pre5-ac1.
>
Try the source, there's a comment at the end of include/i386/xor.h that
explains (not in great detail, but perhaps google or another archive can
help there?).

Good luck,
Jurriaan

-- 
Intel - they couldn't spell intelligent!
GNU/Linux 2.4.20-pre4-ac2 SMP/ReiserFS 2x1402 bogomips load av: 0.08 0.06 0.07
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jan Kasprzak: "Re: RAID5 checksum algorithm selection"
Previous message: James Bottomley: "Re: aic7xxx sets CDR offline, how to reset?"
In reply to: Jan Kasprzak: "RAID5 checksum algorithm selection"
Next in thread: Jan Kasprzak: "Re: RAID5 checksum algorithm selection"
Reply: Jan Kasprzak: "Re: RAID5 checksum algorithm selection"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 22:00:17 EST