Re: Large block device patch, part 1 of 9

From: Thunder from the hill (thunder@lightweight.ods.org)
Date: Tue Sep 03 2002 - 15:05:10 EST

Next message: Pete Zaitcev: "Re: question on spinlocks"
Previous message: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: Large block device patch, part 1 of 9"
In reply to: Daniel Phillips: "Re: Large block device patch, part 1 of 9"
Next in thread: Daniel Phillips: "Re: Large block device patch, part 1 of 9"
Reply: Daniel Phillips: "Re: Large block device patch, part 1 of 9"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi,

On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> If you must have a clever macro:
>
> #define lli(foo) (long long int) (foo)
> #define llu(foo) (long long unsigned) (foo)

Type safety not given.

Thunder

-- --./../...-/. -.--/---/..-/.-./..././.-../..-. .---/..-/.../- .- --/../-./..-/-/./--..-- ../.----./.-../.-.. --./../...-/. -.--/---/..- .- -/---/--/---/.-./.-./---/.--/.-.-.- --./.-/-.../.-./.././.-../.-.-.-

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Pete Zaitcev: "Re: question on spinlocks"
Previous message: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: Large block device patch, part 1 of 9"
In reply to: Daniel Phillips: "Re: Large block device patch, part 1 of 9"
Next in thread: Daniel Phillips: "Re: Large block device patch, part 1 of 9"
Reply: Daniel Phillips: "Re: Large block device patch, part 1 of 9"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 22:00:18 EST