Re: [PATCH 1 / ...] i386 dynamic fixup/self modifying code

From: Jamie Lokier (lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk)
Date: Tue Sep 03 2002 - 16:35:03 EST


Luca Barbieri wrote:
> > For the other fixups though you -have- to do them before you
> > run the code. That isnt hard (eg sparc btfixup). You generate a list of
> > the addresses in a segment, patch them all and let the init freeup blow
> > the table away
> Is doing them at runtime with the aforementioned workaround fine?

I would suggest that the init time table is infinitely saner, but if
there will be compiler generated instructions that are hard to catch, do
both: init time fixups for the __asm__ statements, and run time for
compiler generated instructions.

You really want the init time fixups anyway, because a really _really_
obvious optimisation is to remove `lock' prefixes on UP.

-- Jamie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 22:00:19 EST