Re: [TRIVIAL PATCH] Remove list_t infection.

From: Daniel Phillips (phillips@arcor.de)
Date: Tue Sep 03 2002 - 20:52:22 EST


On Wednesday 04 September 2002 02:41, Rusty Russell wrote:
> In message <Pine.LNX.4.33.0209031610200.10759-100000@penguin.transmeta.com> you
> write:
> >
> > On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> > >
> > > 1. struct list
> > > 2. struct list_node
> > >
> > > With these two types, `list_add' et al. can actually _check_ that you
> > > got the arguments the right way around.
> >
> > Well, the thing is, one of the _advantages_ of "struct list_head" is
> > exactly the fact that the implementation is 100% agnostic about whether a
> > list entry is the head, or just part of the list.
>
> Excellent. Well I'm glad that's sorted.
>
> Now please apply my patch (which got sidelined by nomenclature fetishers),

Yep, half a frog in the blender is better than no frog.

-- 
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 22:00:20 EST