Re: [PATCH] Important per-cpu fix.

From: Thunder from the hill (thunder@lightweight.ods.org)
Date: Wed Sep 04 2002 - 10:44:51 EST


Hi,

On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, David S. Miller wrote:
> Oh, "I'm" willing to upgrade "my" compiler, it's my users that are the
> problem. If you impose 3.1 or whatever, I get less people testing on
> sparc64 as a result.

Oh, well. I couldn't use gcc 3.* on sparc64 for some weird reason, gcc
2.95* is unable to handle all that crap, and the egcs hackup can't handle
the current kernel code. So what?

                        Thunder

-- 
--./../...-/. -.--/---/..-/.-./..././.-../..-. .---/..-/.../- .-
--/../-./..-/-/./--..-- ../.----./.-../.-.. --./../...-/. -.--/---/..-
.- -/---/--/---/.-./.-./---/.--/.-.-.-
--./.-/-.../.-./.././.-../.-.-.-

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 22:00:22 EST