Mike Isely <isely@pobox.com> said:
> On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:
>
> > Mike Isely <isely@pobox.com> writes:
> >
> > >The trivial patch at the end of this text fixes DMA w/ LBA48 problems
> >
> > More readable would be:
> >
> > >- if (!hwif->pci_dev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_PROMISE_20246) {
> > >+ if (!(hwif->pci_dev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_PROMISE_20246)) {
> >
> > if (hwif->pci_dev->device != PCI_DEVICE_ID_PROMISE_20246) {
> >
>
> Yes that is true. But this is Andre's code and it seemed to me to be
> more important to follow his style. But whatever...
What is wrong with != here?
-- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 22:00:25 EST