On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Nivedita Singhvi wrote:
>
> > value in your results is in saving on retransmits; I would think
> > shoving the data down the NIC and avoid the fragmentation shouldnt
> > give you that much significant CPU savings. Do you have any stats
>
> Why do say that? Wouldnt the fact that youre now reducing the
> number of calls down the stack by a significant number provide
> a significant saving?
I am not sure; if he gets a busy system in a congested network, i can
see the offloading savings i.e i am not sure if the amortization of the
calls away from the CPU is sufficient enough savings if it doesnt
involve a lot of retransmits. I am also wondering how smart this NIC
in doing the retransmits; example i have doubts if this idea is briliant
to begin with; does it handle SACKs for example? What about
the du-jour algorithm, would you have to upgrade the NIC or can it be
taught some new trickes etc etc.
[also i can see why it makes sense to use this feature only with sendfile;
its pretty much useless for interactive apps]
Troy, i am not interested in the nestat -s data rather the TCP stats
this NIC has exposed. Unless those somehow show up magically in netstat.
cheers,
jamal
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 22:00:28 EST