Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000

From: John Levon (movement@marcelothewonderpenguin.com)
Date: Fri Sep 06 2002 - 13:31:57 EST

Next message: Jim Houston: "O(1) Scheduler (tuning problem/live-lock)"
Previous message: Peter T. Breuer: "Re: (fwd) Re: [RFC] mount flag "direct""
In reply to: Andi Kleen: "Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000"
Next in thread: Dave Hansen: "Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 08:26:46PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:

> > c0216ecc 257768 11.4219 inet_bind
>
> The profile looks bogus. The NIC driver is nowhere in sight. Normally
> its mmap IO for interrupts and device registers should show. I would
> double check it (e.g. with normal profile)

The system summary shows :

58181 1.8458 0.0000 /lib/modules/2.4.18+O1/kernel/drivers/net/acenic.o

so it won't show up in the monolithic kernel profile. You can probably
get a combined comparison with

op_time -dnl | grep -e 'vmlinux|acenic'

regards
john

-- 
 "Are you willing to go out there and save the lives of our children, even if it means losing your own life ?
 Yes I am.
 I believe you, Jeru... you're ready."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jim Houston: "O(1) Scheduler (tuning problem/live-lock)"
Previous message: Peter T. Breuer: "Re: (fwd) Re: [RFC] mount flag "direct""
In reply to: Andi Kleen: "Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000"
Next in thread: Dave Hansen: "Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 22:00:30 EST