Paul Larson wrote:
>
> In the nightly ltp run against the bk 2.5 tree last night I saw this
> show up in the logs.
>
> It happened on the 2-way PIII-550, 2gb physical ram, but not on the
> smaller UP box I test on.
>
> mtest01: page allocation failure. order:0, mode:0x50
scsi, I assume?
This will be failed bounce buffer allocation attempts.
That's fine, normal. block will fall back to the mempool
and will wait.
Of course, your shouldn't be bounce buffering at all. This
is happening because of the block-highmem problem. There's
a workaround at
http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/2.5/2.5.33/2.5.33-mm4/broken-out/scsi_hack.patch
But please bear in mind, this "page allocation failure" message
is purely a developer diagnostic thing. The reason it is there
is so that if some random toaster driver oopses over a failure
to handle an allocation failure, the person who reports the bug
can say "I saw an allocation failure and then your driver crashed".
Which tells the driver developer where to look.
Under heavy load, page allocation attempts _will_ fail, and
that's OK. The mempool-backed memory will become available.
It's a bit CPU-inefficient, and I have code under test which
changes GFP_NOFS mempool allocators to not even bother trying
to enter page reclaim if the nonblocking allocation attempt
failed.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 22:00:30 EST