On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 09:22:22PM +0400, Hans Reiser wrote:
> I think I prefer that we implement a repacker for reiser4 though, as
> that, combined with delayed allocation, will be a balanced and thorough
> solution.
How does current ReiserFS fare against extreme fragmentation? What
about XFS? Without trying to risk a flamewar, what Linux filesystems
are the most preventive of fragmentation?
The filesystem could make a huge difference on a machine like a mail
server...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 22:00:30 EST