Re: LMbench2.0 results

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Sat Sep 07 2002 - 13:53:26 EST

Next message: Alexander Viro: "Re: Question about pseudo filesystems"
Previous message: Andre Hedrick: "Re: ide-scsi oops"
In reply to: Jeff Garzik: "Re: LMbench2.0 results"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: LMbench2.0 results"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: LMbench2.0 results"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, 7 Sep 2002, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote:
> > Comments?
>
> Yeah: "ouch" because I don't see a single category that's faster.

HZ went to 1000, which should help multimedia latencies a lot.

> Oh well, it still needs to be tuned....

For throughput or for latency ? ;)

Rik

-- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

Spamtraps of the month: september@surriel.com trac@trac.org

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alexander Viro: "Re: Question about pseudo filesystems"
Previous message: Andre Hedrick: "Re: ide-scsi oops"
In reply to: Jeff Garzik: "Re: LMbench2.0 results"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: LMbench2.0 results"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: LMbench2.0 results"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 22:00:32 EST