Hm, actually I am.
And from the oops traces, the offending intruction always seems to be a
pop.
I'll upgrade and try again.
Thanks,
Sapan
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 06:48:16PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-09-11 at 18:16, lists@corewars.org wrote:
> > Just in case this might shed some more light on the problem...
> > I recompiled the kernel with frame pointers about a week ago, and I
> > didn't face a single oops till today morning, when I recompiled the
> > kernel without frame-pointers and I've been getting the same
> > oopses all day.
> >
>
> Are you using gcc 3.0.x or an early gcc 3.1.x. There are bugs in those
> where they write below the stack pointer which means an IRQ will corrupt
> stuff. Turning on frame pointers might well hide this
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 15 2002 - 22:00:28 EST