Re: Killing/balancing processes when overcommited

From: Jesse Pollard (pollard@admin.navo.hpc.mil)
Date: Thu Sep 12 2002 - 16:22:10 EST

Next message: Gerhard Mack: "Re: [OFFTOPIC] Spamcop"
Previous message: Gregoire Favre: "Re: 2.5.34 unable to mount root fs on 09:00 (smp,raid1,devfs,scsi)"
In reply to: Thunder from the hill: "RE: Killing/balancing processes when overcommited"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "RE: Killing/balancing processes when overcommited"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thursday 12 September 2002 04:15 pm, Thunder from the hill wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 12 Sep 2002, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Because I've run real world large systems before. Ulimit is at best a
> > handy little toy for stopping web server accidents.
>
> Only if you assume that a bunch of users tries very hard to use up all the
> resources...
>
> Thunder

It only takes one.

-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jesse I Pollard, II Email: pollard@navo.hpc.mil

Any opinions expressed are solely my own. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Gerhard Mack: "Re: [OFFTOPIC] Spamcop"
Previous message: Gregoire Favre: "Re: 2.5.34 unable to mount root fs on 09:00 (smp,raid1,devfs,scsi)"
In reply to: Thunder from the hill: "RE: Killing/balancing processes when overcommited"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "RE: Killing/balancing processes when overcommited"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 15 2002 - 22:00:31 EST