On Fri, 13 Sep 2002, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Rik, I didn't include the iowait patch because we don't seem to have
> a tarball of procps which supports it - the various diffs you have at
> http://surriel.com/procps/ appear to be in an intermediate state wrt
> cygnus CVS.
Umm no, the latest patch I put up yesterday is fully in sync
with the cygnus CVS tree ...
> The code is in experimental/iowait.patch. Could we have a snapshot
> tarball of the support utilities please?
... but I've put up a snapshot, if that makes you happy ;)
The snapshot is of the latest procps code from procps CVS,
including your patch to top.
regards,
Rik
-- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
Spamtraps of the month: september@surriel.com trac@trac.org
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 15 2002 - 22:00:33 EST