Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this time]

• Next message: Aaron Lehmann: "Re: [PATCH] zerocopy NFS for 2.5.36"
• Previous message: Ben Greear: "Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this time]"
• In reply to: Ben Greear: "Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this time]"
• Next in thread: Ben Greear: "Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this time]"
• Reply: Ben Greear: "Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this time]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

   From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
   Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 19:07:33 -0700

   David S. Miller wrote:
   
> I mean put the ifdefs in a header file such as tcp.h, not in the *.c
> code.
   
   Would you object to me just removing all of them and having the patch
   unconditionally compiled in?

Your comments say that SIOCBINDTODEVICE behavior is changed, how can
we legitimately do that all the time without breaking apps?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Aaron Lehmann: "Re: [PATCH] zerocopy NFS for 2.5.36"
• Previous message: Ben Greear: "Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this time]"
• In reply to: Ben Greear: "Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this time]"
• Next in thread: Ben Greear: "Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this time]"
• Reply: Ben Greear: "Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this time]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 23 2002 - 22:00:25 EST