On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 11:10:20PM +0530, Dipankar Sarma wrote:
> >
> > In any case, we all know often acquired global locks are a bad idea on
> > a 32-way, and should be avoided like the plague. I just wish we had a
> > dcache solution that didn't even need locks as much... :)
>
> You have one - dcache_rcu. It reduces the dcache_lock acquisition
> by about 65% over fastwalk.
I should clarify, this was with a webserver benchmark.
For those who want to use them, Maneesh's dcache_rcu-12 patch and my
RCU "performance" infrastructure patches are in -
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=8875&release_id=111743
The latest release is 2.5.36-mm1.
rcu_ltimer and read_barrier_depends are pre-requisites for dcache_rcu.
Thanks
-- Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> http://lse.sourceforge.net Linux Technology Center, IBM Software Lab, Bangalore, India. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 23 2002 - 22:00:31 EST