Re: [OT] backtrace

From: David Mosberger-Tang (David.Mosberger@acm.org)
Date: Thu Oct 03 2002 - 10:46:51 EST


>>>>> On Thu, 03 Oct 2002 11:50:03 +0200, Keith Owens <kaos@sgi.com> said:

  Keith> Most architectures compile with -fomit-frame-pointer (except
  Keith> for ARM where RMK does it differently). Neither gdb not
  Keith> glibc can cope with kernel code built with
  Keith> -fomit-frame-pointer. See the horrible heuristics kdb has to
  Keith> apply to get any sort of backtrace on i386.

Keith knows this, but just to be clear: there is no problem unwinding
across functions compiled with -fomit-frame-pointer on ia64. (Other
platforms could do the same if they took advantage of DWARF2 unwind
info.)

        --david
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 22:00:40 EST