Re: New BK License Problem?

From: John Levon (levon@movementarian.org)
Date: Fri Oct 04 2002 - 20:54:36 EST

Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: oops in bk pull (oct 03)"
Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: oops in bk pull (oct 03)"
In reply to: Larry McVoy: "Re: New BK License Problem?"
Next in thread: Roman Zippel: "Re: New BK License Problem?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 05:32:16PM -0700, Larry McVoy wrote:

> And in the "for what it is worth" department, when we contemplate changes
> to the BKL,

To be frank, I could not imagine a more appropriate list for discussion
of changes to lock_kernel() !

</misunderstanding>

regards
john

-- 
"Me and my friends are so smart, we invented this new kind of art:
 Post-modernist throwing darts"
	- the Moldy Peaches
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: oops in bk pull (oct 03)"
Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: oops in bk pull (oct 03)"
In reply to: Larry McVoy: "Re: New BK License Problem?"
Next in thread: Roman Zippel: "Re: New BK License Problem?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 22:00:49 EST