Re: [patch] IDE driver model update

From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt (benh@kernel.crashing.org)
Date: Tue Oct 08 2002 - 10:05:35 EST

Next message: Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net: "RE:Re: The reason to call it 3.0 is the desktop (was Re: [OT] 2.6 not 3.0 - (NUMA))"
Previous message: Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net: "RE:Re: The end of embedded Linux?"
In reply to: Alexander Viro: "Re: [patch] IDE driver model update"
Next in thread: jbradford@dial.pipex.com: "Re: [patch] IDE driver model update"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>Ouch. That (reconnects) may require interesting things from queue-related
>code. What behaviour do you want while card is disconnected? All requests
>getting errors / all requests getting blocked / reads failing, writes
>blocking?

Same problem I beleive with the hotswap ATAPI bay I have on some
machines, and probably very similar at the queue level to the
problem of USB & FireWire drives.

Ben.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net: "RE:Re: The reason to call it 3.0 is the desktop (was Re: [OT] 2.6 not 3.0 - (NUMA))"
Previous message: Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net: "RE:Re: The end of embedded Linux?"
In reply to: Alexander Viro: "Re: [patch] IDE driver model update"
Next in thread: jbradford@dial.pipex.com: "Re: [patch] IDE driver model update"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:24 EST