On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, J.A. Magallon wrote:
> >should always be 0.0% and it always is 0.0% here.
> >
> >I have no idea why it's displaying a wrong value on your
> >system, unless you somehow managed to run against a wrong
> >libproc.so (shouldn't happen).
>
> It looks like the 2 first screenshots show buggy data:
Yup, that's the bug I fixed friday. Wait a moment, I fixed
it for five_cpu_numbers(), but probably not for the SMP CPU
code in top.c itself ...
I'll fix this one after lunch.
thanks,
Rik
-- A: No. Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:25 EST