Re: Linux 2.5.41-ac1

From: Adrian Bunk (bunk@fs.tum.de)
Date: Tue Oct 08 2002 - 10:35:36 EST

Next message: Joseph D. Wagner: "RE: 2.4.9/2.4.18 max kernel allocation size"
Previous message: Andreas Dilger: "Re: The reason to call it 3.0 is the desktop (was Re: [OT] 2.6 not 3.0 - (NUMA))"
In reply to: James Bottomley: "Re: Linux 2.5.41-ac1"
Next in thread: Kai Germaschewski: "Re: Linux 2.5.41-ac1"
Reply: Kai Germaschewski: "Re: Linux 2.5.41-ac1"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, James Bottomley wrote:

> bunk@fs.tum.de said:
> > make[1]: *** No rule to make target `arch/i386/mach-voyager/
> > trampoline.o', needed by `arch/i386/mach-voyager/built-in.o'. Stop.
> > make: *** [arch/i386/mach-voyager] Error 2
>
> That one's pulled in from ../kernel by the vpath in mach-voyager (or should
> be). It builds for me, so it could be the version of make you are using?

Ah, then Kai's changes to the build system in 2.5.41 broke it.

Kai, what's the recommended way to get this working again?

> James

cu
Adrian

You only think this is a free country. Like the US the UK spends a lot of time explaining its a free country because its a police state. Alan Cox

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Joseph D. Wagner: "RE: 2.4.9/2.4.18 max kernel allocation size"
Previous message: Andreas Dilger: "Re: The reason to call it 3.0 is the desktop (was Re: [OT] 2.6 not 3.0 - (NUMA))"
In reply to: James Bottomley: "Re: Linux 2.5.41-ac1"
Next in thread: Kai Germaschewski: "Re: Linux 2.5.41-ac1"
Reply: Kai Germaschewski: "Re: Linux 2.5.41-ac1"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:25 EST