Re: [ANNOUNCE] procps 2.0.10

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Tue Oct 08 2002 - 11:46:18 EST

Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [patch] 512-byte alignment for O_DIRECT I/O"
Previous message: Dave Hansen: "Re: 2.5.40-mm2"
In reply to: J.A. Magallon: "Re: [ANNOUNCE] procps 2.0.10"
Next in thread: J.A. Magallon: "Re: [ANNOUNCE] procps 2.0.10"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, J.A. Magallon wrote:

> >Yup, that's the bug I fixed friday. Wait a moment, I fixed
> >it for five_cpu_numbers(), but probably not for the SMP CPU
> >code in top.c itself ...
>
> I swear, I had not seen five_cpu_numbers when I sent you the patch
> about 0.1%...

But that code is used on UP systems. I forgot to do the same
fix for SMP...

Rik

-- A: No. Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [patch] 512-byte alignment for O_DIRECT I/O"
Previous message: Dave Hansen: "Re: 2.5.40-mm2"
In reply to: J.A. Magallon: "Re: [ANNOUNCE] procps 2.0.10"
Next in thread: J.A. Magallon: "Re: [ANNOUNCE] procps 2.0.10"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:25 EST